13 July 2025

Earhart Expedition and the Taraia Ojbect

 Most folks know I am a history enthusiast. Even as a boy I was interested in the past, so this next subject is "right up my alley," as my mom used to say.

The people at Purdue Research Foundation announced last week they are putting together a joint expedition with the Archaeological Legacy Institute on 5 November 2025, to confirm the findings of Amelia Earhart's plane, which disappeared somewhere in the South Pacific in July 1937. Many attempts have been made to locate the craft, but none have been successful.

Over the years, researchers have speculated that Earhart and her navigator, Fred Noonan, made an emergency landing on a deserted island called Nikomaroro. Within a lagoon on the island, there is an anomaly called the "Taraia Object," found by satellite, which could be Earhart's Lockheed Electra.

Well, I had to look for myself. So I fired up Google Earth and started searching for Nikomaroro Island. I admit I could not have found it on my own; it is truly a mere speck in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. It is about as isolated as you can get from any living creature on the planet.

Once I located the island, I started hunting for the Taraia Object (I had no visual references to follow because I am stubborn adventurous and I wanted to see if I could find it myself). The island is very small so the search did not take long. And yes, I quickly found something: off the northwestern shore of the island two circular objects and a roughly triangular shaped object with straight edges just 700 feet offshore.

I quickly noticed something just 700 feet off the northwestern shore.

An angle looking southeast. What is this? This debris (if I can call it that) is submerged in shallow water offshore.

Looking directly above, the object to the left does not look like a naturally occurring object. And what are the two round objects in the left-center and right-center? They look like manmade objects, don't they? If you look closely there is debris scattered all over.

Of course, I thought I found the Taraia Object, but I was wrong. Below is (or was) the Taraia Object:


The Taraia Object is the faint dark line in the direct center of the image, just offshore, above this spit of land. Older satellite imagery showed a tube like structure, which was thought to be an aircraft fuselage. However, other researchers say it is nothing more than an uprooted palm tree. No longer visible, researchers think it probably has been covered in silt.


What I did not know, until I looked deeper into this mystery, is the most common hypothesis is that Earhart and Noonan set up "Camp Zero" on the northwestern shore of the island and sent radio signals from the damaged aircraft, which is how investigators were able to eventually focus on Nikumaroro Island. The northwestern shore is where I found these anomalous objects!


The Taraia Object is at location B. The anomaly I found is in location A. North is at the top of the image.


The object I found and the location of the Taraia Object are some distance away from each other, but 88 years of tides, pounding waves, cyclones and storms could easily have carried debris all across this small island. If it is submerged, it is like finding a needle in a haystack.

At least 12 expeditions have explored Nikumaroro Island since 1989. Human bones have been found on the island, as well as a woman's shoe, a compact case and a jar of freckle cream, which Earhart was known to use. This seems to be strong evidence; however, researchers are still looking for her Lockheed Electra and no evidence of an aircraft has ever been found there. It is also possible the plane was carried out to sea and we will never find it.

Will this research team finally be able to solve this mystery? Furthermore, what did I find on the northwestern shore of the island? Is it parts of Earhart's plane? Maybe an old shipwreck? Perhaps we'll find out in November!


01 July 2025

Rain Gauge Blues

 I started this site for a place to "jot down life stuff." I prefer to write about things interesting and extraordinary, but unfortunately I do not encounter much of that in my life. Most of it is mundane. 

Can mundane be interesting? Probably not. But that won't stop me from bragging about my new rain gauge.

A rain gauge is not a complicated instrument; at least it shouldn't be. But humans are really good at making very simple ideas into very convoluted concepts. As I posted on social media a few days ago, I started shopping for a new rain gauge because my old one wore itself out measuring all the water we got over the last week. As far as I can tell, I got between 0.5 and 6.5 inches of rain in my backyard since last Friday. I don't know for sure because I couldn't read the measurements on the glass tube anymore. 

I suspect all that UV exposure from all those sunny days when the rain gauge rendered itself useless really did a number on the thing.

After about 20 years of service, it was finally time to put the old boy out to pasture. Also, that mysterious crusty brown stuff at the bottom was probably radioactive.


So I set out to buy myself a new one -- something nice, but not too expensive. I searched Amazon because 1) I am too lazy to actually get in my car and go to a store and 2) I do not have to encounter other human beings while I shop at home. Hey, it's a win/win.

As I mentioned on social media, I found one that I really liked on Amazon, but I suspect AI attempted to pitch the product and I wasn't very impressed:

Not impressed at all. Too bad, because I liked this one.


So I kept looking. Eventually I found something that rang my bell. 

The one I chose said it was "freeze proof" but I call bullshit on that. When it gets below 32 degrees Fahrenheit, water is going to freeze, it doesn't matter if the water is inside the tube or outside the tube. Furthermore, water, in its frozen state, is going to expand inside the tube and the gauge is going to crack. Folks who choose not to believe in science can go ahead and leave their new rain gauge outside during a Minnesota winter and we'll see how it fairs.

But what really sold me on this particular product is the claim (I swear) that it was "Made in the USA." My parents taught me to always support American businesses when I can, so I did just that. 

So I was a little disappointed when this crap showed up:

Luckily, as an American citizen, I am used to being misled.


Disappointed as I was, I couldn't be bothered to send thing thing back. After all, it was shipped and delivered to my doorstep within 24 hours. So, I unpackaged the shiny new rain gauge -- which came with its own cute little stand -- and I have spent the afternoon sitting in my yard, drinking coffee and smoking a cigar, waiting for the rain to come and be measured.

If that's not mundane, I am not sure what is.

"She's a beaut, Clark."